PUA Forum
https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/

Slag
https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=20684		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Fin [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Slag
As a PUA do you think you forfit the right to call a girl a slut?

Just something I'm tossing up for debate.
Author:  Xecutioner [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:22 pm ]
Post subject: 
No way! Not as long as anyone else has the right to judge you
Author:  mOlis_pir3s [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:48 pm ]
Post subject: 
theres a difference to a slut..who will literally go with ANYBODY..hence the term slag/slut..and a hb that you manage to seduce through whatever method it is you're using..

you should always be aware though how 'easy' they are before you judge your game.. because if you're just going for fugly chicks who fuck anyone thats weak game..

as a PUA i dont think you forfit that right, a woman can be a slut whether you're a PUA or and AFC doesnt matter.. if anything you should be able to distinguish much easier between a slut and a non-slut.

at least thats how i feel
Author:  Chief [ Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:09 am ]
Post subject: 
You don't lose ANY rights as a PUA.

I just think that someone who studies pickup would understand that EVERY woman wants to have sex just as much as anyone, and that there is nothing wrong with expressing your sexuality.

I think PUA would understand the hypocrisy of judging any woman in a negative light for expressing any kind of sexuality.
Author:  Rye Lee [ Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:33 pm ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
You don't lose ANY rights as a PUA.

I just think that someone who studies pickup would understand that EVERY woman wants to have sex just as much as anyone, and that there is nothing wrong with expressing your sexuality.

I think PUA would understand the hypocrisy of judging any woman in a negative light for expressing any kind of sexuality.
Agreed.

Chicks want it more so than men, believe it or not, hence why there are so many girls that are labeled as "sluts". Don't be so judgemental of them for the fact that they desire to express their sexuality, as you probably want to express yours and no one has the right to judge anyone elses choices, only your own.

That being said, there are some girls that are utter tramps and yeah, I have no problem saying they're sluts, but at the same time, I call a lot of PUAs out there sluts too, because they fuck anything with a hole between it's legs and a set of tits, whether they like them, or even think they're annoying, or despicable human beings. I have no problem having sex with lots of different people, but there had better be a connection there, otherwise you are just as bad as those girls that you label sluts.
Author:  Gay [ Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
I think we can call them what we want, but it doesn't mean its true.
Author:  Xecutioner [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:30 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Chicks want it more so than men, believe it or not, hence why there are so many girls that are labeled as "sluts".
I disagree with this conclusion. The reason men arent labeled "sluts" is because it has always been normal for a man to be.... sexual predators, for lack of better words. The term "slut" is biased towards women, along with "bitch"- which has dramatically become less offensive and more unisex.

Society is still struggling to realize the sexual liberation of everyone...but more importantly women. By today's generation' s standards its completely acceptable for women to initiate sexual relationships with others, contrary to every other generation before 40 years ago. Not to mention pre-marital sex.

Society is branching out and taking several new identities. The old standards and stereotypes are fading along with the last of the generations that stubbornly upheld them.

I do however agree that there is a difference between promiscous nature and being sleezy.
Author:  Rye Lee [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:39 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Quote:
Chicks want it more so than men, believe it or not, hence why there are so many girls that are labeled as "sluts".
I disagree with this conclusion. The reason men arent labeled "sluts" is because it has always been normal for a man to be.... sexual predators, for lack of better words. The term "slut" is biased towards women, along with "bitch"- which has dramatically become less offensive and more unisex.

Society is still struggling to realize the sexual liberation of everyone...but more importantly women. By today's generation' s standards its completely acceptable for women to initiate sexual relationships with others, contrary to every other generation before 40 years ago. Not to mention pre-marital sex.

Society is branching out and taking several new identities. The old standards and stereotypes are fading along with the last of the generations that stubbornly upheld them.

I do however agree that there is a difference between promiscous nature and being sleezy.
Sorry I was very tired when I wrote that and I meant "so many MORE girls are labeled as sluts". Sure you can blame it on social bias too, but if you take a look at the world without the social bias glasses on, it still looks like there are a lot more promiscuous girls out there than men, as men are often more prone to one-itis, or don't have the skills to pursue many women.

Women have much better social interaction skills, to the point where even the "shy girls" are getting laid a lot more than most guys and combine that with the fact that they have such a high sex drive and you get lots of girls having lots of sex. The thing is that most of these sexual encounters aren't sleazy (slutty), but had because there was a connection on some level, yet they are still being labeled as sluts due to the number of partners.

Hopefully that was a bit better...I'm still really bloody tired... :roll:
Author:  Killians [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:38 pm ]
Post subject: 
I would say more girls are having sex, BUT the average guy still has more sex partners compared to the average girl.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/