PUA Forum
https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/

Mind Tricks
https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=135&t=51075		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  SoCo123 [ Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:06 am ]
Post subject:  Mind Tricks
Hey Guys,
I'm reading through this new course i bought on the iphone app store called "get any girl". I really like it, it focuses on removing mental blocks so that you can become naturally more confident. The course has a couple sections about something called "anchoring", i guess it's something in NLP. I've never tried it before, have any of you had success with this kind of technique?
Author:  Havok123 [ Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:47 am ]
Post subject: 
Yes. Anchoring is using any communication technique to illicit behaviors or change a persons view on something. This can be a VERY bad thing. But it can also be a very GOOD thing in regards to women and business. :)

If you do some research or buy a book on it, NLP will discuss exact anchoring techniques. But I will briefly explain one for you.

The word "success"

Say it a couple of of times.... success....success....SUCCESS....

Sound like any other familiar words?

how about S E X?

When first meeting a woman that I want to sub-communicate and get her feeling very attracted INSTANTLY is talking about positive subjects. I enjoy women who are powerful and positive in life. I talk about success a lot.

I use the word success as an anchor. When I present the question I point towards her crotch when asking: "how do you define SUCCESS"

And then when she asks me, I will point to my junk when I say "I define SUCCESS as...blah blah blah..."

It is said in NLP that after 3 times an act BEGINS making neuro pathways in your brain to make the act a habit. HOW NUTS IS THAT!! you body's bio-chemistry actually changes because of habits you are forcing on yourself!!

Wild stuff huh?
Author:  Charlie Neptune [ Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:25 pm ]
Post subject: 
Here's a copy of a post on anchoring I wrote. You can use words, objects, a touch, a look etc. The repetition and finding a positive hook to it is the key.

Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:03 am    Post subject: Anchoring/Peacocking Mix
Read up on these methods if you are not familiar. I'll give a short explanation if you are feeling lazy.

I first heard about anchoring from Ross Jeffries sugar packet routine. You use an item, your touch, a word, etc to elicit a positive feeling from a woman. Example: Every time you and a woman laugh squeeze her elbow. After repeating this several times she will subconsciously associate that positive feeling with that touch. You can then use that touch at your will to arouse the same sensation in her again.

Peacocking is simple. Dress flashy, over the top, and fun to stand out from the crowd. Like a peacock.

I like to combine the two with shiny kids toy jewelry sold in the 25c vending machines. Women love jewelry and will notice that you are wearing an oversized shiny pink plastic ring on your pinky. Especially if you are flashing it around.

The peacocking end is easy. Just wear it. Accessorize around it. I was in a fun bar in NYC with live music, pool tables, and ping pong tables. I was fairly dressy with a green boa, a shiny yellow necklace, and the over sized pink pinky ring.

The anchoring part is more involved. I'm making the rounds and HB9+ appears in front of me. I give her a big smile and tell her I have better "bling" and show her my pink ring as I stroke my chin. She gives a robust laugh. THATS THE HOOK. She is intrigued with me and laughing. My hooks are the word "bling" and my pink ring. I'll also try and go back to the pose of stroking my chin with the pinky ring at her eye level.

As we talk I intermittently grab her jewelery and check out her "bling". She giggles,

Her: "It's not as BLING as yours!".
Me: "Hellllll nooooooooooo I'm the BLINGIEST baby" and put my hand with the pink ring up to my chin as we laugh.

I excuse myself and tell her I have to go talk to my friend. Walking away is very powerful. Returning and making her laugh will only increase the effectiveness. I make sure I can see her so she doesn't leave without seeing me again. I'll circle back and flash the ring. She laughs and welcomes me back. Escalation is easy from there.

At the end of the night I grab her number. As I'm leaving I place the pink ring in her hand and squeeze it over the ring. I look her in the eyes and tell her, "Take care of my bling until I see you again". I walk off without kissing her to heighten the tension and anticipation for next time. I turn around and she is gazing at the ring, smiling, and clenching it close to her. We lock eyes and smile again as I walk out.

We made out like animals in the bar next time we got together and f-closed. Luckily, she's a great girl and we get along very well. Good skills helped me find a girl I enjoy seeing and may lead to something very rewarding. Such a powerful approach certainly contributed to her viewing me as someone she'd enjoy dating
Author:  Slywalker [ Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
I don't like using material from such a common source, the risk of being called out for it is too high.
If you can pick up a few fragments from it to improve your game, then sure go for it!
Author:  Slywalker [ Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
I just want to add, that the anchoring can be very effective if your innergame is good enough, go for it!
Author:  The Doctor [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:56 am ]
Post subject: 
Anchoring is simply creating a conditioned response to a specific something... like stopping at a red light. Anchoring is also called classical, Pavlovian or respondent conditioning. It's based on Pavlovian theory which was most famously displayed in Pavlov's experiments (Pavlovs Dog). See Below for an excerpt on Pavlov's experiment:


Pavlov's Experiment

The original and most famous example of classical conditioning involved the salivary conditioning of Pavlov's dogs. During his research on the physiology of digestion in dogs, Pavlov noticed that, rather than simply salivating in the presence of meat powder (an innate response to food that he called the unconditioned response), the dogs began to salivate in the presence of the lab technician who normally fed them. Pavlov called these psychic secretions. From this observation he predicted that, if a particular stimulus in the dog’s surroundings were present when the dog was presented with meat powder, then this stimulus would become associated with food and cause salivation on its own. In his initial experiment, Pavlov used a metronome to call the dogs to their food and, after a few repetitions, the dogs started to salivate in response to the metronome. Thus, a neutral stimulus (metronome) became a conditioned stimulus (CS) as a result of consistent pairing with the unconditioned stimulus (US - meat powder in this example). Pavlov referred to this learned relationship as a conditional reflex (now called conditioned response).

Classical conditioning- A type of learning in which an organism comes to associate stimuli, neutral stimulus that signals an unconditional stimulus (US) begins to produce a response that anticipates and prepares for the unconditioned stimulus. It is also called Pavlovian or respondent conditioning
Author:  Here4reviews [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:15 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Anchoring is simply creating a conditioned response to a specific something... like stopping at a red light. Anchoring is also called classical, Pavlovian or respondent conditioning. It's based on Pavlovian theory which was most famously displayed in Pavlov's experiments (Pavlovs Dog). See Below for an excerpt on Pavlov's experiment:


Pavlov's Experiment

The original and most famous example of classical conditioning involved the salivary conditioning of Pavlov's dogs. During his research on the physiology of digestion in dogs, Pavlov noticed that, rather than simply salivating in the presence of meat powder (an innate response to food that he called the unconditioned response), the dogs began to salivate in the presence of the lab technician who normally fed them. Pavlov called these psychic secretions. From this observation he predicted that, if a particular stimulus in the dog’s surroundings were present when the dog was presented with meat powder, then this stimulus would become associated with food and cause salivation on its own. In his initial experiment, Pavlov used a metronome to call the dogs to their food and, after a few repetitions, the dogs started to salivate in response to the metronome. Thus, a neutral stimulus (metronome) became a conditioned stimulus (CS) as a result of consistent pairing with the unconditioned stimulus (US - meat powder in this example). Pavlov referred to this learned relationship as a conditional reflex (now called conditioned response).

Classical conditioning- A type of learning in which an organism comes to associate stimuli, neutral stimulus that signals an unconditional stimulus (US) begins to produce a response that anticipates and prepares for the unconditioned stimulus. It is also called Pavlovian or respondent conditioning
Good example
Author:  donjuan88 [ Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Quote:
Anchoring is simply creating a conditioned response to a specific something... like stopping at a red light. Anchoring is also called classical, Pavlovian or respondent conditioning. It's based on Pavlovian theory which was most famously displayed in Pavlov's experiments (Pavlovs Dog). See Below for an excerpt on Pavlov's experiment:


Pavlov's Experiment

The original and most famous example of classical conditioning involved the salivary conditioning of Pavlov's dogs. During his research on the physiology of digestion in dogs, Pavlov noticed that, rather than simply salivating in the presence of meat powder (an innate response to food that he called the unconditioned response), the dogs began to salivate in the presence of the lab technician who normally fed them. Pavlov called these psychic secretions. From this observation he predicted that, if a particular stimulus in the dog’s surroundings were present when the dog was presented with meat powder, then this stimulus would become associated with food and cause salivation on its own. In his initial experiment, Pavlov used a metronome to call the dogs to their food and, after a few repetitions, the dogs started to salivate in response to the metronome. Thus, a neutral stimulus (metronome) became a conditioned stimulus (CS) as a result of consistent pairing with the unconditioned stimulus (US - meat powder in this example). Pavlov referred to this learned relationship as a conditional reflex (now called conditioned response).

Classical conditioning- A type of learning in which an organism comes to associate stimuli, neutral stimulus that signals an unconditional stimulus (US) begins to produce a response that anticipates and prepares for the unconditioned stimulus. It is also called Pavlovian or respondent conditioning
Good example
thanks, that was a good read
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/