| PUA Forum https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| Infield footage of my student who's been studying for a year https://pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=126&t=92289 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | AFC Adam [ Wed May 25, 2011 3:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Infield footage of my student who's been studying for a year |
He's now one of my instructors. In just over a year he's become pretty decent. Enjoy the video. |
|
| Author: | thumper858 [ Wed May 25, 2011 4:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Other than the shakiness this was AWESOME! One thing though and I don't wanna quote, but I believe it said that this was direct game. Now personally, I have never read up on direct game, but I assume (terrible thing to do) that it just means that you come straight to the point of what your intentions are with a girl you are meeting. In this case, he came right out and said that he was interested in her because of her looks. But it seemed to me that his routine changed to more of an indirect game. Either that or maybe I've been running a combination of direct and indirect game this entire time. What I mean by this is, he asked her a question, DHV'd with a story related to her answer, and followed it up with another question. There were other things he did that I would relate to my own routine, and I guess you could say that I use the Mystery/Styles method. Story telling, time travel (you're growing right before my eyes), false time constraint (I'm actually headed this way. I'm going to get my hair cut and it's up here on the right) and some other things I can't remember out the top of my head. Now, I am in no way bashing this guy. His game is on point and everyone can see that. I'm just wondering if this is actual direct game or not. |
|
| Author: | Ryan Black SashaPUA [ Wed May 25, 2011 10:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Other than the shakiness this was AWESOME!
You're correct about what direct is. I think what you're noticing is that, although his opener is somewhat direct ("cute" is pretty weak as compliments go...) his interaction lacks INTENT. I didn't pick up on anything really sexual in his vibe, no innuendo, and I don't think much kino at all. She could easily be forgiven for thinking that he wants to be her new gay best friend. Especially that way of talking where everything is a question, he seems very apologetic and not masculine.One thing though and I don't wanna quote, but I believe it said that this was direct game. Now personally, I have never read up on direct game, but I assume (terrible thing to do) that it just means that you come straight to the point of what your intentions are with a girl you are meeting. In this case, he came right out and said that he was interested in her because of her looks. But it seemed to me that his routine changed to more of an indirect game. Either that or maybe I've been running a combination of direct and indirect game this entire time. What I mean by this is, he asked her a question, DHV'd with a story related to her answer, and followed it up with another question. There were other things he did that I would relate to my own routine, and I guess you could say that I use the Mystery/Styles method. Story telling, time travel (you're growing right before my eyes), false time constraint (I'm actually headed this way. I'm going to get my hair cut and it's up here on the right) and some other things I can't remember out the top of my head. Now, I am in no way bashing this guy. His game is on point and everyone can see that. I'm just wondering if this is actual direct game or not. It seems like he's opened direct, but then fallen back on standard indirect "attraction building" material and routines. However, once you have opened directly and she stays, you HAVE attraction, so that's completely unnecessary. It's more useful to go straight to qualification - screening for traits YOU like in her, to basically find out if she's worth the time to take out on a date sometime, of course mixed in with a few stories here or there so she knows something about you too. I totally disagree with asking which way she's walking initially. Unless she's legitimately in a rush, she will stay talking to you for 5-10 minutes, long enough to get a number. You can build so much more sexual intent with body language, kino and eye contact when you're standing right in front of her, than walking side by side. |
|
| Author: | Brah [ Wed May 25, 2011 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
would be very helpful to have a written transcript. would make it easier to follow and analyze. |
|
| Author: | shuggs [ Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Quote: Other than the shakiness this was AWESOME!
.Now, I am in no way bashing this guy. His game is on point and everyone can see that. I'm just wondering if this is actual direct game or not. agree with Ryan mostly...there is virtually no sexual vibe so if she does meet up with him when he tries to get sexual then it will feel weird. I have trouble imagining this guy fucking her..just my opinion. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|